From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched: memory corruption on completing completions
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:46:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150204154618.36511661ab558c0a9e047a77@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D2AA16.6030706@oracle.com>
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:24:06 -0500 Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was fuzzing with trinity on a -next kernel with the KASan patchset, and
> got what initially appeared to be a rather odd trace:
>
> ...
>
>
> I now have a theory for why it happens:
>
> Thread A Thread B
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> [Enter function]
> DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(x)
> wait_for_completion(x)
> complete(x)
> [In complete(x):]
> spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
> x->done++;
> __wake_up_locked(&x->wait, TASK_NORMAL, 1);
> [Done waiting, wakes up]
> [Exit function]
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
>
>
>
> So the spin_unlock_irqrestore() at the end of complete() would proceed to corruption
> the stack of thread A.
But wait_for_completion() takes ->wait.lock as well, which should
provide the needed synchronization (__wait_for_common,
do_wait_for_common). I'm not seeing a hole in the logic, but it looks
like there might be one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-04 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 23:24 Sasha Levin
2015-02-04 23:46 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2015-02-05 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-05 7:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-05 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-05 20:44 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-05 20:59 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-05 21:02 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-05 21:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-05 22:37 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-05 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 6:48 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 15:00 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 12:29 ` Raghavendra K T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150204154618.36511661ab558c0a9e047a77@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.ryabinin@samsung.com \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®