From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752508AbbBFLqm (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 06:46:42 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:53003 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751162AbbBFLqk (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 06:46:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:46:20 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Liam Girdwood , "agross@codeaurora.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" Message-ID: <20150206114620.GS21293@sirena.org.uk> References: <1422413199-17273-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> <1422413199-17273-3-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> <20150128195204.GN21293@sirena.org.uk> <20150130000741.GP11960@sonymobile.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7oKEdG9azDL9djiO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: My LESLIE GORE record is BROKEN ... User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] regulator: core: Introduce set_optimum_mode op X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --7oKEdG9azDL9djiO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:16:54PM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > I think this covers your concern about patch 3-7 as well, please let me > > know what you think. > Mark, any suggestions on this? > I need a way to pass the expected current consumption from the mmc > framework through our regulator driver to the RPM to make our eMMC > stable. > We can discuss the proposed "cleanups" next time we meet if you prefer. Could you be a little more specific about what suggestions you're looking for? You've quoted a rather large e-mail there where you seemed to say you were going to send a new version of the series so I think I was expecting something to review here. --7oKEdG9azDL9djiO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJU1KmHAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQHrMH/322cmq1TC9g5o7gtNBes9jL Xp6aT49RKwRRaVK1Sg1ZtRB8EjMEyOP6uECkleduKbLMm+StMIqfPDVb5TmjlqCU 9NWA/xCfHjhJ8rMAETNITgjLgAwbId0kRhMD/yi4k0EIlGJXQILLIBjcvYUg1kyb DEfRZvf7RwBrC7PmoZst8yBKr3KaT8nWIJlcfiwBnQa9Vqu1LwfYhq+i9VN+WoQb P2qIq46Wm7vG+S3lF+rTN8q0XkdhMD7i4J/qziLSu+gS9NdzS4fbfF9nm46extXy dASMbtroPUrkb3ZQJKR3D9UPEhl/6wv+31HallsZIpNHU4hTisb81Y8Mv9vruw8= =GXWS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7oKEdG9azDL9djiO--