From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758034AbbBFVSK (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:18:10 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0179.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.179]:36681 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755221AbbBFVSH (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:18:07 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6E657665747340676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:1981:2194:2199:2393:2553:2559:2562:2892:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:4250:4321:5007:6119:6261:6742:7514:7875:7903:7907:8660:10004:10394:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12043:12438:12517:12519:12555:12740:13069:13148:13161:13229:13230:13255:13311:13357:13618:14096:14097:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: mouth41_466f1a1d22351 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2432 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:18:03 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Sedat Dilek Cc: LKML , "Paul E. McKenney" , Dave Hansen , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-next , Stephen Rothwell , Kristen Carlson Accardi , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU Message-ID: <20150206161803.30cdd90e@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20150206200653.009919583@goodmis.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:07:56 +0100 Sedat Dilek wrote: > Your patchset fixes the issue for me (look at the attached files for > more detailed information). So I can add your Tested-by tag? > > I tested the "To Be Loved" (TBL VS. TLB flushes) edition against > Linux-next (next-20150204) where I had originally seen and reported > the call-trace. > > Before I forget... The Fixes-tag misses pointing to Dave Hansen's... > > commit d17d8f9dedb9dd76fd540a5c497101529d9eb25a > "x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes" Sure, I can add that, and even Cc stable for 3.17+. > > My POV is that both patches somehow belong together. > If you decide to push them through two different trees, please add a > note/reference to each other. The second patch should reference the first one. But the first patch is a much broader change and more generic which could affect many other locations as well. It is specific to tracepoints, where the tlb one is specific to a single instance. As the first patch affects all tracepoints, I want it in my tree. -- Steve