mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	riel@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com,
	dmatlack@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: add halt_poll_ns module parameter
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:28:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150209172818.GB1804@potion.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D8DBFE.1070508@redhat.com>

2015-02-09 17:10+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 09/02/2015 16:21, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > 2015-02-06 13:48+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> >> +TRACE_EVENT(kvm_vcpu_wakeup,
> >> +	    TP_PROTO(__u64 ns, bool waited),
> > 
> > (__u64 is preferred here?)
> 
> Preferred to what?

To 'u64'.  (The header file shouldn't be reachable from user-space.)

> >> +		} while (single_task_running() && ktime_before(cur, stop));
> > 
> > After reading a bunch of code, I'm still not sure ...
> >  - need_resched() can't be true when single_task_running()?
> >    (I think it could happen -- balancing comes into mind.)
> 
> Single_task_running is per-CPU; for a task to relinquish control to
> another task, you first need to have multiple tasks running.  In other
> words, I think it cannot.

Ok, thanks.  (I thought that need_resched has more general meaning and
couldn't confirm that balancing/CPU-offlining/... just evicts the task
without waiting for its schedule().)

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-09 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-06 12:48 Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09  8:22 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-02-09  9:06   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09 10:12     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-02-09 15:21 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-02-09 16:10   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09 17:28     ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2015-02-09 19:52 ` David Matlack
2015-02-09 21:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-10  7:50   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150209172818.GB1804@potion.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome