From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@126.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>,
Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] sched/rt: Fix wrong SMP scheduler behavior for equal prio cases
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:35:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150216103506.7da87a8a@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424079144-5194-2-git-send-email-xlpang@126.com>
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:32:23 +0800
Xunlei Pang <xlpang@126.com> wrote:
> From: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
>
> Currently, SMP RT scheduler has some trouble in dealing with
> equal prio cases.
>
> For example, in check_preempt_equal_prio():
> When RT1(current task) gets preempted by RT2, if there is a
> migratable RT3 with same prio, RT3 will be pushed away instead
> of RT1 afterwards, because RT1 will be enqueued to the tail of
> the pushable list when going through succeeding put_prev_task_rt()
> triggered by resched. This broke FIFO.
>
> Furthermore, this is also problematic for normal preempted cases
> if there're some rt tasks queued with the same prio as current,
> because current will be put behind these tasks in the pushable
> queue.
>
> So, if a task is running and gets preempted by a higher priority
> task (or even with same priority for migrating), this patch ensures
> that it is put before any existing task with the same priority in
> the pushable queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
I'd love to review this now, but unfortunately I need to get ready for
my trip to Linux Collab. I'll get back to this next week. Feel free to
ping me then. If I have time, I might review this while at the
conference, but don't place any bets that I will.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-16 9:32 [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/plist: Provide plist_add_head() for nodes with the same prio Xunlei Pang
2015-02-16 9:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched/rt: Fix wrong SMP scheduler behavior for equal prio cases Xunlei Pang
2015-02-16 15:35 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2015-02-16 9:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] sched/rt: Check to push the task when changing its affinity Xunlei Pang
2015-02-16 15:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/plist: Provide plist_add_head() for nodes with the same prio Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150216103506.7da87a8a@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pang.xunlei@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=xlpang@126.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®