mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	linaro-networking@linaro.org, Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>, Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevents: Add (missing) default case for switch blocks
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:48:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150220084807.GJ21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150220083842.GA20387@gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:38:42AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Many clockevent drivers are using a switch block for handling modes in their
> > ->set_mode() callback. Some of these do not have a 'default' case and adding a
> > new mode in the 'enum clock_event_mode', starts giving following warnings for
> > these platforms about unhandled modes (e.g. XXX).
> > 
> > 	warning: enumeration value ‘XXX’ not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
> > 
> > This patch adds default cases for them.
> > 
> > In order to keep things simple, add following to the switch blocks:
> > 
> > 	default:
> > 		break;
> > 
> > This can lead to different behavior for individual cases.
> > 
> > 1) Some of the drivers don't have any special stuff in their ->set_mode()
> >    callback before or after the switch blocks. And so this default case would
> >    simply return for them without any updates to the clockevent device.
> > 
> > 2) But in some cases, the clockevent device is disabled/stopped as soon as we
> >    enter the ->set_mode() callback and is enabled within the switch block or
> >    after it. And the clockevent device *may* stay disabled for default case.
> 
> So this whole approach looks fragile for several reasons:
> 
>    - 'mode setting' callbacks are just bad by design
>      because they mix several functions into the same entry
>      point, complicating the handler functions 
>      unnecessarily. We should reduce complexity, not expand 
>      on it.
> 
>    - now by adding 'default' you hide from drivers the
>      ability to easily discover whether it has been updated
>      to some new core clockevents mode setting feature or
>      not.

So this patch was a follow on from bd624d75db21 ("clockevents: Introduce
mode specific callbacks").

That patch changes the set_mode() interface; and provides per mode
functions.

New (and updated) drivers should not use ->set_mode() anymore, but it
was felt that we do not want to go do flag day changes.

And it allows for adding optional modes; not every driver needs to go
implement all mode functions if there is a sane default action.

But it does mean we need to be able to add values to the enum.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-20  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-20  6:32 Viresh Kumar
2015-02-20  8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-20  8:48   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-02-20  9:36     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-20 10:12       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-20 10:52         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-20 11:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-20 11:41         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-20 11:56           ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-20 13:22             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-20 13:58               ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-20 14:04                 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-23  5:33                   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-23 16:37                     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-24 11:11                       ` viresh kumar
2015-02-24 14:54                         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-24 15:12                           ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150220084807.GJ21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=lftan@altera.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-networking@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=realmz6@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome