mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Iulia Manda <iulia.manda21@gmail.com>
Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, peterz@infradead.org, mhocko@suse.cz,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, serge.hallyn@canonical.com,
	dvhart@linux.intel.com, tim.bird@sonymobile.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] kernel: Conditionally support non-root users, groups and capabilities
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:11:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150220161132.d636e85fd4f9698d889243d2@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150211150336.GA2406@winterfell>

On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:03:36 +0200 Iulia Manda <iulia.manda21@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are a lot of embedded systems that run most or all of their functionality
> in init, running as root:root. For these systems, supporting multiple users is
> not necessary.
> 
> This patch adds a new symbol, CONFIG_MULTIUSER, that makes support for non-root
> users, non-root groups, and capabilities optional. It is enabled under
> CONFIG_EXPERT menu.
> 
> When this symbol is not defined, UID and GID are zero in any possible case
> and processes always have all capabilities.
> 
> The following syscalls are compiled out: setuid, setregid, setgid,
> setreuid, setresuid, getresuid, setresgid, getresgid, setgroups, getgroups,
> setfsuid, setfsgid, capget, capset.
> 
> Also, groups.c is compiled out completely.
> 
> In kernel/capability.c, capable function was moved in order to avoid adding two
> ifdef blocks.
> 
> This change saves about 25 KB on a defconfig build.
> 
> The kernel was booted in Qemu. All the common functionalities work. Adding
> users/groups is not possible, failing with -ENOSYS.
> 
> Bloat-o-meter output:
> add/remove: 7/87 grow/shrink: 19/397 up/down: 1675/-26325 (-24650)

The objective seems OK to me - in some kernel applications non-root
users are never needed and it's better to not force those systems to
carry a lump of code they will never use.

How significant is the 25k saving?  On a realistic kernel build for
such a target, what proportion of kernel memory usage are we talking
about here?

Did you look at moving sys_setregid into groups.c (or elsewhere) to
save an ifdef?

I assume that more savings can be squeezed out - there will be fields
in the task_struct and other places which will never be used.  ifdefing
those out will get messy.  Have you done any investigation here?

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-21  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-11 15:03 Iulia Manda
2015-02-21  0:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2015-02-24  0:53   ` josh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150220161132.d636e85fd4f9698d889243d2@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=iulia.manda21@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
    --cc=tim.bird@sonymobile.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome