From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753099AbbBWMDn (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 07:03:43 -0500 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:57844 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752410AbbBWMDl (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 07:03:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:03:29 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Lee Jones Cc: Andy Shevchenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Mike Turquette , Bryan Huntsman , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Ralf Baechle , Sylwester Nawrocki , Tomeu Vizoso Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] clkdev: change prototype of clk_register_clkdev() Message-ID: <20150223120329.GN8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1424692181-14455-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1424692181-14455-2-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20150223115356.GA21609@x1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150223115356.GA21609@x1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:53:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-pcom.c | 9 +++++---- > > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c | 5 ++++- > > arch/mips/ath79/clock.c | 6 +++--- > > drivers/clk/clk-bcm2835.c | 12 +++++++----- > > drivers/clk/clk-max-gen.c | 9 ++++----- > > drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c | 6 +++--- > > drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 13 ++++++++----- > > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410-dclk.c | 19 +++++++++--------- > > drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- > > include/linux/clkdev.h | 2 +- > > 11 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) > > What's tying all of these changes together? It would be better > (simpler for you) if you split them up by subsystem and resubmitted. I think maybe, just maybe, you might get the answer to that if you read the patch. You can't change the function signature without creating lots of warnings and causing regressions. Yes, the function could be renamed whilst doing this change, but that's really quite sub-standard in an already busy namespace. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.