From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: live kernel upgrades (was: live kernel patching design)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:19:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150224121919.GB3081@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150224105328.GB20698@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:53:28AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> > [...] We could optimize the kernel the craziest way we
> > can, but hardware takes its time to reinitialize. And in
> > most cases, you'd really need to reinitalize it; [...]
>
> If we want to reinitialize a device, most of the longer
> initialization latencies during bootup these days involve
> things like: 'poke hardware, see if there's any response'.
> Those are mostly going away quickly with modern,
> well-enumerated hardware interfaces.
>
> Just try a modprobe of a random hardware driver - most
> initialization sequences are very fast. (That's how people
> are able to do cold bootups in less than 1 second.)
Have you ever tried to boot a system with a large (> 100) number of
drives connected over FC? That takes time to discover and you have to do
the discovery as the configuration could have changed while you were not
looking.
Or a machine with terabytes of memory? Just initializing the memory
takes minutes.
Or a desktop with USB? And you have to reinitialize the USB bus and the
state of all the USB devices, because an application might be accessing
files on an USB drive.
> In theory this could also be optimized: we could avoid the
> reinitialization step through an upgrade via relatively
> simple means, for example if drivers define their own
> version and the new kernel's driver checks whether the
> previous state is from a compatible driver. Then the new
> driver could do a shorter initialization sequence.
There you're clearly getting in the "so complex to maintain that it'll never
work reliably" territory.
> But I'd only do it only in special cases, where for some
> reason the initialization sequence takes longer time and it
> makes sense to share hardware discovery information between
> two versions of the driver. I'm not convinced such a
> mechanism is necessary in the general case.
--
Vojtech Pavlik
Director SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-16 18:52 [PATCH 0/3] prevent /proc/<pid>/stack garbage for running tasks Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-16 18:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_task_call() Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-16 20:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-16 22:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-17 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 14:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-17 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 21:25 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-18 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-18 17:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-19 0:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 4:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-19 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 16:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-19 16:33 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2015-02-19 17:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-19 17:08 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-19 17:19 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2015-02-19 17:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-19 17:48 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2015-02-19 20:40 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2015-02-19 21:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-20 7:46 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-20 8:49 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-20 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-20 10:02 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-20 10:44 ` live patching design (was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_task_call()) Ingo Molnar
2015-02-20 10:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-20 19:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-20 21:46 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2015-02-20 22:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-21 18:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-22 8:52 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-22 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-22 19:18 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-23 12:43 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-24 10:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-21 18:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-21 18:57 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-21 19:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-21 19:31 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-21 19:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-21 20:10 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-21 20:53 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-22 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-22 9:08 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-22 9:46 ` live kernel upgrades (was: live kernel patching design) Ingo Molnar
2015-02-22 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-22 10:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-22 19:13 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-22 23:01 ` Andrew Morton
2015-02-23 0:18 ` Dave Airlie
2015-02-23 0:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2015-02-23 8:17 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-23 10:42 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-02-23 11:08 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2015-02-23 11:50 ` Pavel Machek
2015-02-24 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-24 12:28 ` Jiri Slaby
2015-03-05 0:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-23 6:35 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2015-02-24 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-24 12:12 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2015-02-24 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-24 12:19 ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2015-02-22 14:37 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-22 16:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-22 19:03 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-24 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-24 11:10 ` Petr Mladek
2015-02-24 12:36 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2015-02-23 11:39 ` Pavel Machek
2015-02-24 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-24 12:11 ` Jiri Slaby
2015-02-24 13:18 ` live kernel upgrades Pavel Emelyanov
2015-02-20 16:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_task_call() Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-20 20:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-20 21:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-20 17:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-19 21:26 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-19 21:38 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-19 23:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-16 18:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] stacktrace: add save_stack_trace_tsk_safe() Josh Poimboeuf
2015-02-18 0:13 ` Andrew Morton
2015-02-20 9:32 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-02-16 18:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] proc: fix /proc/<pid>/stack for running tasks Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150224121919.GB3081@suse.cz \
--to=vojtech@suse.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®