mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>, <monstr@monstr.eu>, <balbi@ti.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Subject: Re: SPDX-License-Identifier
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:00:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150225220047.GS11136@saruman.tx.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150225214950.GB29527@amd>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1949 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:49:51PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > >Is one tag per directory sufficient?  Is one tag per file sufficient?
> > > >How about one tag per package?  If package, then isn't a single tag for
> > > >the whole kernel source tree sufficient, as we all know the overall
> > > >license for the kernel source tree.
> > > 
> > > We really need one tag per file.
> > 
> > I fail to see the justification for this, why?  Why not per directory?
> > Why not per function?  Why not per driver?  Why not per line?  Why not
> > per project?  Who has dictated this seemingly arbitrary rule?
> 
> That's how licenses are done today.
> 
> Why would I like to see SPDX?
> 
> So that GPL header at begining of each file becomes one line... and so
> that if it is BSD/GPL dual licensed is plain to see, and I don't have
> to read the notices saying "oh this is gpl.. but if you want to,
> delete gpl above and use license below".

why isn't git grep -e 'MODULE_LICENSE' enough ? It's also a single line
and gives you the license for that driver.

> > Our DCO process ensures that.
> > 
> > > - Some parts of the Linux source code are also used by other projects.
> > >   Or are derived from other projects. Because of this they are
> > >   explicitly licensed under different licenses than the GPLv2
> > >   (compatible to it though of course). Or are dual-licensed. So that
> > >   they can be used by these other projects.
> > 
> > That's fine, we encourage that and want to see that happen.  How will
> > SPDX change that at all?  It's obvious as to the license of the files
> > that this happens with, why do anything extra?
> 
> Well, sometimes parsing license agreements at the top of file is
> interesting, that's where SPDX would help, and that's why having
> single SPDX per linux kernel would not work.

if you can parse SPDX, why can't you parse MODULE_LICENSE() ?

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-25 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-19  9:40 [PATCH RFC] usb: gadget: Add xilinx axi usb2 device support Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta
2014-02-20 18:23 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-02-21  6:38   ` Michal Simek
2014-02-21 16:04     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-02-21 16:04       ` Michal Simek
2014-02-21 16:12         ` SPDX-License-Identifier (was: Re: [PATCH RFC] usb: gadget: Add xilinx axi usb2 device support) Felipe Balbi
2014-02-21 16:18           ` SPDX-License-Identifier Michal Simek
2014-02-21 16:20             ` SPDX-License-Identifier Felipe Balbi
2014-02-21 16:56               ` SPDX-License-Identifier Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-02-21 17:26                 ` SPDX-License-Identifier Michal Simek
2014-02-21 17:57                   ` SPDX-License-Identifier Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-02-21 19:01                     ` SPDX-License-Identifier Theodore Ts'o
2014-02-24 10:12                       ` SPDX-License-Identifier Michal Simek
2014-02-24 13:41                         ` SPDX-License-Identifier Theodore Ts'o
2014-02-24 14:03                           ` SPDX-License-Identifier Michal Simek
2014-02-24 14:26                             ` SPDX-License-Identifier Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-02-25 12:10                               ` SPDX-License-Identifier One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-25 12:25                                 ` SPDX-License-Identifier Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-02 15:43             ` SPDX-License-Identifier Stefan Roese
2015-02-02 16:06               ` SPDX-License-Identifier Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-02-04 16:41                 ` SPDX-License-Identifier Stefan Roese
2015-02-05  4:21                   ` SPDX-License-Identifier Theodore Ts'o
2015-02-05  6:41                   ` SPDX-License-Identifier Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-02-25 21:49                     ` SPDX-License-Identifier Pavel Machek
2015-02-25 22:00                       ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2015-02-26 21:49                         ` SPDX-License-Identifier Pavel Machek
2015-02-26 10:26                       ` SPDX-License-Identifier One Thousand Gnomes
2015-02-26 13:39                         ` SPDX-License-Identifier Theodore Ts'o
2015-02-26 21:53                         ` SPDX-License-Identifier Pavel Machek
2015-02-05 11:49                   ` SPDX-License-Identifier One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-21 16:23         ` [PATCH RFC] usb: gadget: Add xilinx axi usb2 device support Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-02-21 11:27   ` Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta
2014-02-21 15:39     ` Felipe Balbi
2014-03-10 13:36       ` sundeep subbaraya
2014-03-10 18:44         ` Felipe Balbi
2014-02-21 12:04   ` Mark Rutland
2014-02-21 13:41     ` Michal Simek
2014-02-21 13:57       ` Mark Rutland
2014-02-21 14:06         ` Michal Simek
2014-02-21 15:42       ` Felipe Balbi
2014-02-21 15:51         ` Michal Simek
2014-02-21 16:00           ` Felipe Balbi
2014-02-21 16:15           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-21 15:41     ` Felipe Balbi
2014-02-21 16:13       ` Mark Rutland
2014-03-26 10:07   ` sundeep subbaraya
2014-04-15 17:18     ` Felipe Balbi
2014-04-15 17:55       ` Alan Stern
2014-04-16  4:39         ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150225220047.GS11136@saruman.tx.rr.com \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=pavel@denx.de \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=wd@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome