From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: entry.S: tidy up several suboptimal insns
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:50:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150226075049.0f791b50@grimm.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150226114703.GA4660@gmail.com>
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:47:03 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> The bona fide removal of a real instruction from a true hot
> path is generally always worth doing, you don't even have
> to 'prove' that it improves things: unless the claim is
> that for some really robust reason the instruction was zero
> cost to begin with.
I agree that removing instructions from hot paths are for the most part
worth doing without any proof, as long as it doesn't change behavior or
increase the memory footprint. But that's not the case here. If the
change does affect behavior or increases memory footprint, then it
should prove itself as worth doing.
-- Steve
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-26 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 18:51 Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-24 18:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: get rid of KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-24 19:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-24 20:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-24 22:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-25 9:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-25 16:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-26 11:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-26 15:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-26 15:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-25 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-25 12:48 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-25 13:25 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-25 13:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-24 18:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: save r11 into pt_regs->eflags on SYSCALL64 fastpath Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-24 22:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-24 18:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: save user %rsp in pt_regs->sp Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-24 22:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-24 19:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: entry.S: tidy up several suboptimal insns Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 20:13 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-24 20:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 22:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-02-24 22:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-24 22:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-02-24 22:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-24 23:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-02-24 23:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-24 23:26 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-25 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-25 9:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-02-25 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-25 14:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-25 15:40 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-25 16:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-25 16:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-26 11:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-26 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-26 12:50 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150226075049.0f791b50@grimm.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®