From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754631AbbCBXKO (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 18:10:14 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45250 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754002AbbCBXKL (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 18:10:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 15:10:09 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Mike Kravetz Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nadia Yvette Chambers , Davidlohr Bueso , Aneesh Kumar , Joonsoo Kim Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] hugetlbfs: optionally reserve all fs pages at mount time Message-Id: <20150302151009.2ae58f4430f9f34b81533821@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1425077893-18366-1-git-send-email-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> References: <1425077893-18366-1-git-send-email-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:58:08 -0800 Mike Kravetz wrote: > hugetlbfs allocates huge pages from the global pool as needed. Even if > the global pool contains a sufficient number pages for the filesystem > size at mount time, those global pages could be grabbed for some other > use. As a result, filesystem huge page allocations may fail due to lack > of pages. Well OK, but why is this a sufficiently serious problem to justify kernel changes? Please provide enough info for others to be able to understand the value of the change.