From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754781AbbCBQAj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:00:39 -0500 Received: from skprod3.natinst.com ([130.164.80.24]:59889 "EHLO ni.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751687AbbCBQAg (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:00:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:00:14 -0600 From: Ben Shelton To: David Miller Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: plusb: Add support for National Instruments host-to-host cable Message-ID: <20150302160014.GA28172@bshelton-desktop> References: <1424116026-27869-1-git-send-email-ben.shelton@ni.com> <20150220.151417.1734124571561269613.davem@davemloft.net> <20150227212632.GA11789@bshelton-desktop> <20150227.173538.507712773812639200.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150227.173538.507712773812639200.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on US-AUS-MGWOut2/AUS/H/NIC(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 03/02/2015 10:00:34 AM, Serialize by Router on US-AUS-MGWOut2/AUS/H/NIC(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 03/02/2015 10:00:34 AM, Serialize complete at 03/02/2015 10:00:34 AM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2015-03-02_01:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/27, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Shelton > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:26:32 -0600 > > > On 02/20, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Ben Shelton > >> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:47:06 -0600 > >> > >> > The National Instruments USB Host-to-Host Cable is based on the Prolific > >> > PL-25A1 chipset. Add its VID/PID so the plusb driver will recognize it. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Ben Shelton > >> > >> Applied, thanks. > > > > Hi David, > > > > Is this something you think would go into stable as well? > > I'm ambivalent. In that case, could you go ahead and apply it to stable as well? Thanks, Ben