From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757499AbbCCS5o (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 13:57:44 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:36239 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756422AbbCCS5m (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 13:57:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 13:57:37 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20150303.135737.630359651880852880.davem@davemloft.net> To: johannes@sipsolutions.net Cc: joe@perches.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/14] wireless: Use eth__addr instead of memset From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1425370617.2450.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <0c710456e4875ff00c1a9fcff9378ed15110dcd3.1425354528.git.joe@perches.com> <1425370617.2450.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.7 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:57:42 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Johannes Berg Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:16:57 +0100 > Other than that, I guess I'll apply this, but I really wish there was a > way to distinguish more easily which of these require alignment and > which don't. You can't apply "this" without the dependency patch #1. Therefore this should probably all go through my tree.