From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753684AbbCEAdk (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 19:33:40 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:50309 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750839AbbCEAdi (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 19:33:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 00:33:23 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Lee Jones , Liam Girdwood , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Stephen Boyd , Andy Gross , Chanwoo Choi , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Srinivas Kandagatla , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: <20150305003323.GA21293@sirena.org.uk> References: <1425356740-26285-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> <1425356740-26285-2-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> <20150303124700.GN21293@sirena.org.uk> <20150303160250.GD26334@sonymobile.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qyCEDz8sjg330OCf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150303160250.GD26334@sonymobile.com> X-Cookie: My LESLIE GORE record is BROKEN ... User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add Qualcomm RPM regulator subnodes X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --qyCEDz8sjg330OCf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:02:51AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > rpm { > compatible =3D "qcom,rpm-apq8960"; >=20 > regulators { > compatible =3D "qcom,rpm-pm8921-regulators"; Oh, so what you're saying is that the pm8921 is not actually a MFD at all? Why name it like a MFD component then? --qyCEDz8sjg330OCf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJU96RSAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQJTsH/3C6CP5ixQtzfB3ePboz03LG s3y+0PFsx9Tt6w3q75c39BfEoFISb3dMdharGgQXhU50q4q9v7yybTQaklahzPpS ziES+YWB9VOoH6xGqlO/k5/P+B8liVMYJEOPioca/85Te4zSfeuXw3TFsKUO6c0S k6mJTgF39WOe14ABSeBhe7SNjwvvgEHQ80DTun+ofEYYNU08DCwD25Xwk+5iqa3g 02bobO+Fw6BbTkvX7TwSviXao2EERdoWm+9h3kl4PXcqwJMJ+OcKFlPXuWwRjyAg GRw/eentT9ku0YGGN/gLg/A+fKKvbpdugtgbXjZYssIY276D/a31VYY7Oosb7YE= =WkUL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qyCEDz8sjg330OCf--