From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758530AbbCESB3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:01:29 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0098.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.98]:47278 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753880AbbCESB2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:01:28 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6E657665747340676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:979:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2691:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3167:3351:3622:3865:3866:3867:3870:3872:3873:3874:4383:5007:6261:7875:7903:7904:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12296:12517:12519:12663:12740:13069:13255:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: metal93_468862015e038 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1642 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:01:22 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Alexander Kuleshov , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1][CLEANUP] x86: use already defined macros instead of hard-coded values Message-ID: <20150305130122.6db014c8@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20150305175229.GD3042@home.goodmis.org> References: <1425562251-10218-1-git-send-email-kuleshovmail@gmail.com> <20150305172253.GA2051@pd.tnic> <20150305175229.GD3042@home.goodmis.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:52:29 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 06:22:53PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > This patch introduces two new bugs. For educational purposes I'm not > > going to tell you where they are but let you find them. > > Hmm, for educational purposes, I believe I found three bugs. Was the third > bug for extra credit? > Nevermind, there isn't a third bug. It was a bug in my C code that tested this patch. Used a 32bit version of PGDIR_SHIFT. ;-) -- Steve