From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758822AbbCEUqt (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 15:46:49 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:39424 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757525AbbCEUqs (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 15:46:48 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:46:32 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Eric B Munson Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Roland Dreier , Sean Hefty , Hal Rosenstock , Mike Marciniszyn Subject: Re: Resurrecting the VM_PINNED discussion Message-ID: <20150305204632.GT21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20150303174105.GA3295@akamai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150303174105.GA3295@akamai.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:41:05PM -0500, Eric B Munson wrote: > All, > > After LSF/MM last year Peter revived a patch set that would create > infrastructure for pinning pages as opposed to simply locking them. > AFAICT, there was no objection to the set, it just needed some help > from the IB folks. > > Am I missing something about why it was never merged? Because I got lost in IB code and didn't manage to bribe anyone into fixing that for me.