From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754547AbbCGLS4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Mar 2015 06:18:56 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:55930 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752751AbbCGLSx (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Mar 2015 06:18:53 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 11:18:38 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Kumar Gala Cc: Kenneth Westfield , Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood , Banajit Goswami , Patrick Lai , David Brown , Bryan Huntsman , Greg KH , ALSA Mailing List , MSM Mailing List , Device Tree Mailing List , Kernel Mailing List Message-ID: <20150307111838.GI28806@sirena.org.uk> References: <1425428519-12224-1-git-send-email-kwestfie@codeaurora.org> <1425428519-12224-3-git-send-email-kwestfie@codeaurora.org> <7E5AFC65-1705-4BDC-B57F-0444E83A8987@codeaurora.org> <20150306015131.GA15850@kwestfie-linux.qualcomm.com> <20150306220342.GA25363@kwestfie-linux.qualcomm.com> <37AEDC0C-448D-4F3A-B87D-C37B9F2D8E1B@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HkMjoL2LAeBLhbFV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37AEDC0C-448D-4F3A-B87D-C37B9F2D8E1B@codeaurora.org> X-Cookie: Editing is a rewording activity. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [Patch V7 02/10] ASoC: qcom: Document LPASS CPU bindings X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --HkMjoL2LAeBLhbFV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 04:06:48PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: As previously and repeatedly requested please fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs, not doing this makes your mails harder to read and reply to. I've reflowed your message for legibility. > > The audio DSP is, in fact, contained within the audio subsystem. The > > representation of that relationship in the DT, I believe, would be a su= bnode. > > OTOH, if there is a strong sentiment towards using a phandle, that woul= d be > > fine with me. > Just depends on how we communicate with the DSP. If its mostly via > MMIO access than a sub node makes sense. If its via some other > RPC/communication mechanism than possibly a phandle. Trying to > understand a bit more to than see what I=E2=80=99d recommend. It should be a phandle, while these things are all part of the same logical function in the CPU they're separate IPs and there may be many DAIs. --HkMjoL2LAeBLhbFV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJU+t6NAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQP8cH/1TSR9AtKzeR9iTdXDlf13aa b2WIll9t73mx3P0InEhzBMM3ENA/juCxKKuE5I3yPHc+Ux46WsQlhd97+BOKDCzl 2paN2XiZoESfR/IhtBbu8MY6ydykbzEqi7SD+rO49FeB+eqtaYO2t7sDY79xh7Op zrqBR7uWhMSRq/kcpQ74NQILicoRVRcWLIz42ZAspuGzO9KPjyDMoS7oJGArOBu0 ydeU83tpyenFPu4RRg3wmXWaJ+YCx39Pkm3ZaPu0v2mtcoi1avoFrXGfMe0IJb0j 7KE/oASWrJ4fA4IBtjrlBqb7PR63fVAnhmBhnt4INRoMQOXuU4GtO3cxLp8xwqg= =LqNV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HkMjoL2LAeBLhbFV--