From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] rcu: Panic if RCU tree can not accommodate all CPUs
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 18:48:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150307184821.GA15033@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150307174234.GL5236@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 09:42:34AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 06:03:36PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > Currently a condition when RCU tree is unable to accommodate
> > the configured number of CPUs is not permitted and causes
> > a fall back to compile-time values. However, the code has no
> > means to exceed the RCU tree capacity neither at compile-time
> > nor in run-time. Therefore, if the condition is met in run-
> > time then it indicates a serios problem elsewhere and should
> > be handled with a panic.
> >
> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
>
> The place to put a check like this is in the code that calculates
> nr_cpu_ids. And at least some (perhaps all) are set up so that nr_cpu_ids
> cannot exceed NR_CPUS, which would render this check redundant.
The emphasis here the existing check (... n > rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS])
(below as [1]) should not cause the fall back to compiled-time values.
It either must panic or, as you say - redundant.
> So I have to say "no" to this one.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 15 +++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 48d640c..7588c7f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -3889,16 +3889,19 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
> > rcu_capacity[i] = rcu_capacity[i - 1] * CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT;
> >
> > /*
> > + * The tree must be able to accommodate the configured number of CPUs.
> > + * If this limit is exceeded than we have a serious problem elsewhere.
> > + *
> > * The boot-time rcu_fanout_leaf parameter is only permitted
> > * to increase the leaf-level fanout, not decrease it. Of course,
> > * the leaf-level fanout cannot exceed the number of bits in
> > - * the rcu_node masks. Finally, the tree must be able to accommodate
> > - * the configured number of CPUs. Complain and fall back to the
> > - * compile-time values if these limits are exceeded.
> > + * the rcu_node masks. Complain and fall back to the compile-
> > + * time values if these limits are exceeded.
> > */
> > - if (rcu_fanout_leaf < CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF ||
> > - rcu_fanout_leaf > sizeof(unsigned long) * 8 ||
> > - n > rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS]) {
[1]
> > + if (n > rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS])
> > + panic("rcu_init_geometry: rcu_capacity[] is too small");
> > + else if (rcu_fanout_leaf < CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF ||
> > + rcu_fanout_leaf > sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) {
> > WARN_ON(1);
> > return;
> > }
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
>
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-07 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-07 17:03 [PATCH 0/9] rcu: Cleanup RCU tree initialization Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 1/9] rcu: Panic if RCU tree can not accommodate all CPUs Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 18:48 ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2015-03-07 21:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] rcu: Remove superfluous local variable in rcu_init_geometry() Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 18:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 3/9] rcu: Cleanup rcu_init_geometry() code and arithmetics Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 18:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 18:59 ` Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 21:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 4/9] rcu: Simplify rcu_init_geometry() capacity arithmetics Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 5/9] rcu: Limit rcu_state::levelcnt[] to RCU_NUM_LVLS items Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 6/9] rcu: Limit rcu_capacity[] size " Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 7/9] rcu: Remove unnecessary fields from rcu_state structure Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 8/9] rcu: Limit count of static data to the number of RCU levels Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 9/9] rcu: Simplify arithmetic to calculate number of RCU nodes Alexander Gordeev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150307184821.GA15033@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=agordeev@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome