From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751516AbbCHTAX (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2015 15:00:23 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:58976 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750894AbbCHTAU (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2015 15:00:20 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:00:12 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Michal Simek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu, =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F6ren?= Brinkmann , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20150308190012.GV28806@sirena.org.uk> References: <67f3c196833c427a489ca2c530d08987a6b5ee2a.1421412912.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BcZrms9gUsdgyR6a" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <67f3c196833c427a489ca2c530d08987a6b5ee2a.1421412912.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com> X-Cookie: Editing is a rewording activity. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: xilinx: Use standard num-cs binding X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --BcZrms9gUsdgyR6a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 01:55:14PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > Use standard num-cs binding property and setup > "xlnx,num-ss-bits" as deprecated. Why? These properties mean different things - num-cs is a bit confused and is the total number of available chip selects for the system (which could include GPIOs) while num-ss-bits is the size of the bitfield (which could include things not actually mapped out properly/successfully= =20 or something if the hardware designers were feeling particularly inspired). I'm not convinced num-cs ever made any sense. --BcZrms9gUsdgyR6a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJU/Jw7AAoJECTWi3JdVIfQFuUH/iGrogTvEN2ibylzo/fvGwuw mnp69cL2y5sjdegiaYcSchqAZxMqQHz/AeHJBvF5rlB+rb2Xdo4tsrqhZy5iK8iJ PaTBXvX5gcG0cIZaHp7hvq1AY5rM/HUWpDl7bvDYl/JsBIv2eTIQe+NwTr5GrXYd RCK2fkOj73GdHEqaRpAOG+3uHbyzmJtJbW7fq3xfDeaf9nb+loZq7pqgyUUVV6Lq 4e/nf2WKn7Wr7YkZ1ezZSRmUBuA/G1z04qDvEzBFBpGj6sktPJEFOyd07fcyaLBD px0qEWRTZ8tNLuZFx4lXWLOmZBWCb3uPjpax4pMxXViiQJUCz0d04bwGH/KSWX0= =iZtX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BcZrms9gUsdgyR6a--