From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753334AbbCJOge (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:36:34 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46407 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751616AbbCJOg3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:36:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:36:17 +0100 From: Petr Mladek To: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Seth Jennings , Jiri Kosina , Rusty Russell , Miroslav Benes , Masami Hiramatsu , mingo@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch/module: Correctly handle coming and going modules Message-ID: <20150310143617.GA3574@dhcp128.suse.cz> References: <1425907528-22976-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz> <20150309144055.GA10815@treble.redhat.com> <20150310120103.GC1813@dhcp128.suse.cz> <20150310142204.GK10815@treble.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150310142204.GK10815@treble.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 2015-03-10 09:22:04, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 01:01:07PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Mon 2015-03-09 09:40:55, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 02:25:28PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c > > > > index d856e96a3cce..b3ffc231ce0d 100644 > > > > --- a/kernel/module.c > > > > +++ b/kernel/module.c > > > > @@ -3271,6 +3271,10 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs, > > > > } > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH > > > > + mod->klp_alive = false; > > > > +#endif > > > > + > > > > > > I don't think you need this initialization. It looks like the module > > > struct is embedded in the mod->module_core region which is initialized > > > to zero in move_module(). > > > > I have looked at this before but I was not able to find a code > > zeroing struct module. If I get it correctly, mod->module_core > > is a location where symbol table sections are copied or so. > > Yeah, it's far from obvious. AFAICT, it's cleared by the > "memset(ptr, 0, mod->core_size)" line. What I wanted to say is that module_core is not struct module. It seems that it points to the module code. See within_module_core() and how it is used(). By other words, I think that struct module is not zeroed and we need to initialize the bool. Or did I miss anything? Best Regards, Petr