From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751701AbbCLDmA (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:42:00 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:55974 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750890AbbCLDl6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:41:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:41:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20150311.234156.247575265894541661.davem@davemloft.net> To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com, lkp@01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Subject: Re: [rhashtable] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20150312033744.GA13869@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20150312032924.GA12390@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20150312033744.GA13869@gondor.apana.org.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Herbert Xu Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:37:45 +1100 > rhashtable: Add annotation to nested lock > > Commit aa34a6cb0478842452bac58edb50d3ef9e178c92 ("rhashtable: > Add arbitrary rehash function") killed the annotation on the > nested lock which leads to bitching from lockdep. > > Reported-by: Fengguang Wu > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu This doesn't apply to net-next, the second hunk gives a reject.