mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:08:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150311150853.492fee52def529e86506976b@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425569838-20416-1-git-send-email-avagin@openvz.org>

On Thu,  5 Mar 2015 18:37:18 +0300 Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> wrote:

> Let's show locks which are associated with a file descriptor in
> its fdinfo file.
> 
> Currently we don't have a reliable way to determine who holds a lock.
> We can find some information in /proc/locks, but PID which is reported
> there can be wrong. For example, a process takes a lock, then forks a
> child and dies. In this case /proc/locks contains the parent pid, which
> can be reused by another process.
> 
> $ cat /proc/locks
> ...
> 6: FLOCK  ADVISORY  WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF
> ...
> 
> $ ps -C rpcbind
>   PID TTY          TIME CMD
>   332 ?        00:00:00 rpcbind
> 
> $ cat /proc/332/fdinfo/4
> pos:	0
> flags:	0100000
> mnt_id:	22
> lock:	1: FLOCK  ADVISORY  WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF
> 
> $ ls -l /proc/332/fd/4
> lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Mar  5 14:43 /proc/332/fd/4 -> /run/rpcbind.lock
> 
> $ ls -l /proc/324/fd/
> total 0
> lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 0 -> /dev/pts/0
> lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 1 -> /dev/pts/0
> lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:49 2 -> /dev/pts/0
> 
> You can see that the process with the 324 pid doesn't hold the lock.
> 
> This information is required for proper dumping and restoring file
> locks.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/proc/fd.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/fd.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>  #include <linux/security.h>
>  #include <linux/file.h>
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
>  
> @@ -48,16 +49,24 @@ static int seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  		put_files_struct(files);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!ret) {
> -		seq_printf(m, "pos:\t%lli\nflags:\t0%o\nmnt_id:\t%i\n",
> -			   (long long)file->f_pos, f_flags,
> -			   real_mount(file->f_path.mnt)->mnt_id);
> -		if (file->f_op->show_fdinfo)
> -			file->f_op->show_fdinfo(m, file);
> -		ret = seq_has_overflowed(m);
> -		fput(file);
> -	}
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	seq_printf(m, "pos:\t%lli\nflags:\t0%o\nmnt_id:\t%i\n",
> +		   (long long)file->f_pos, f_flags,
> +		   real_mount(file->f_path.mnt)->mnt_id);
> +
> +	show_fd_locks(m, file, files);
> +	ret = seq_has_overflowed(m);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;

seq_has_overflowed() returns a boolean, but fs/seq_file.c:traverse() is
looking for a -ve errno from ->show().

Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt says

If all is well, the show() function should return zero.  A negative error
code in the usual manner indicates that something went wrong; it will be
passed back to user space.  This function can also return SEQ_SKIP, which
causes the current item to be skipped; if the show() function has already
generated output before returning SEQ_SKIP, that output will be dropped.


> +	if (file->f_op->show_fdinfo)
> +		file->f_op->show_fdinfo(m, file);
> +	ret = seq_has_overflowed(m);
>  
> +out:
> +	fput(file);
>  	return ret;
>  }


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-11 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-05 15:37 Andrey Vagin
2015-03-05 19:11 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-06 14:19   ` Andrew Vagin
2015-03-06  8:38 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-03-06 14:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-03-07 13:00   ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-11 22:08 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2015-03-12 15:54   ` Andrew Vagin
2015-03-12 19:23     ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-12 21:31       ` Andrey Wagin
2015-03-12 16:30 ` [PATCH] selftest: add a test case to check how locks are shown in fdinfo Andrey Vagin
2015-03-12 20:43   ` Shuah Khan
2015-03-13  9:34     ` Andrew Vagin
2015-03-13 13:46       ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150311150853.492fee52def529e86506976b@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avagin@openvz.org \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®