From: Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@sonymobile.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <Bjorn.Andersson@sonymobile.com>,
ohad@wizery.com,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
jhugo@codeaurora.org, s-anna@ti.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for Qualcomm HW, Mutex block
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:15:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150311221513.GA27985@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5500A8BE.2060601@sonymobile.com>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:42:38PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
<snip>
> I'm pretty anxious about this one, as my current work has a dependency on it.
> Virtually the entirety of the QualComm SOC work is dependent on this
> because it's needed by the interprocessor communication framework
> and the regulator driver.
>
> I assume we're waiting on the response from Ohad about getting this upstream?
> It's been almost 2 weeks with no reply.
>
> Ohad - do you plan to do anything with this patch? We seem to be at an impasse
> (once again).
With Suman's patches and this, the ball is in Ohad's court. I believe Ohad
does this work in his off time as it is unpaid work.
>
> This is the 6th attempt over the course of the last year and a half to get
> this hwspinlock code mainlined. Should we just not use the hwspinlock
> framework?
>
> What are our options going forward?
Not sure, aside from landing this somewhere else. But that has it's own
inherent issues.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-11 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-11 20:42 Tim Bird
2015-03-11 22:15 ` Andy Gross [this message]
2015-03-12 8:16 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-03-12 15:26 ` Tim Bird
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-27 22:30 [PATCH v6 1/2] DT: hwspinlock: Add binding documentation for Qualcomm hwmutex Bjorn Andersson
2015-02-27 22:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for Qualcomm HW Mutex block Bjorn Andersson
2015-03-11 21:09 ` Andy Gross
2015-03-12 19:31 ` Lina Iyer
2015-03-12 19:43 ` Andy Gross
2015-03-12 19:55 ` Lina Iyer
2015-03-18 16:10 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-03-18 15:55 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-03-18 16:45 ` Lina Iyer
2015-03-18 21:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-03-12 22:29 ` Lina Iyer
2015-03-18 16:12 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-03-18 19:41 ` Lina Iyer
2015-03-16 22:38 ` Jeffrey Hugo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150311221513.GA27985@qualcomm.com \
--to=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Bjorn.Andersson@sonymobile.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=tim.bird@sonymobile.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome