From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754841AbbCMLEl (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:04:41 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42235 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754606AbbCMLEc (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:04:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:04:30 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Omar Sandoval Cc: Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes Message-ID: <20150313110430.GG20767@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Omar Sandoval , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20150312044017.GA7693@mew> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150312044017.GA7693@mew> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:40:17PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > Ping. For anyone following along, it looks like commit cc87317726f8 > ("mm: page_alloc: revert inadvertent !__GFP_FS retry behavior change") > reverted the commit that exposed these bugs. Josef said he was okay with > taking these, will they make it to an upcoming -rc soon? Upcoming yes, but based on my experience with pushing patches that are not really regressions in late rc's it's unlikely for 4.1.