From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945963AbbCMS3R (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:29:17 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:52806 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932277AbbCMS3M (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:29:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:29:08 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lina.iyer@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach Message-ID: <20150313182908.GU30671@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1425385777-14766-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <5501A1DE.9020804@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5501A1DE.9020804@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:25:34PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > do you agree with this patchset ? In principle yes, apart from some function naming and I'm waiting for Lorenzo's ack as well. Do you plan to upstream this directly via your tree? If yes, I'll look in more detail and give some acks. -- Catalin