From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754360AbbCQTFa (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:05:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52407 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752669AbbCQTF2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:05:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:05:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20150317.150520.62518083516614772.davem@redhat.com> To: robert.jarzmik@free.fr Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, nico@fluxnic.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "smc91x: retrieve IRQ and trigger flags in a modern way" From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <878uew8xfe.fsf@free.fr> References: <87egpl8w5q.fsf@free.fr> <20150219.162213.557240575455109795.davem@davemloft.net> <878uew8xfe.fsf@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:06:13 +0100 > David Miller writes: > >> From: Robert Jarzmik >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:48:49 +0100 >> >>> Linus has submitted the patch [1]. I'll be watching carefully until -rc4 that >>> this is applied. If it's not, I'll reping you to apply this revert. Until then, >>> you can forget about it, I'll do the follow-up. >>> >>> Does that plan sound good to you ? >> >> It sounds good to me. > > Hi David, > > Unfortunately Linus's patch didn't make it upstream. Therefore I'll ask you to > apply the revert, which is reminded in [1]. Revert applied, thanks.