From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932454AbbCQOKS (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:10:18 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0193.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.193]:58157 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932232AbbCQOKO (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:10:14 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1540:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3867:3868:3870:3871:3873:3874:5007:6119:6120:6261:6742:7875:7903:8957:10004:10400:10848:10967:11026:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13255:13311:13357:13848:14096:14097:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: sand68_3bc842ce52d46 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2765 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:10:09 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, KOSAKI Motohiro , Nicholas Miell , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Alan Cox , Lai Jiangshan , Stephen Hemminger , Andrew Morton , Josh Triplett , Thomas Gleixner , David Howells , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sys_membarrier(): system/process-wide memory barrier (x86) (v12) Message-ID: <20150317101009.78442f30@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20150317114411.GE3589@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1426447459-28620-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20150316141939.GE21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1203077851.9491.1426520636551.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20150316172104.GH21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1003922584.10662.1426532015839.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20150316205435.GJ21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <910572156.13900.1426556725438.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20150316222611.782cc0e4@grimm.local.home> <20150317064055.GK2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150317114411.GE3589@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 04:44:11 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 07:40:56AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:26:11PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > As I recently found out that this_cpu_read/write() is not that nice on > > > all architectures, > > > > In fact, they only really work well on x86. Aargh64 seems to have a semi > > usable version, but mostly its quite horrible indeed. > > Yeah, if you are in a preempt-disabled region, __this_cpu_read() and > __this_cpu_write() generate much better code on most platforms. > I was just having this discussion with Christoph. I originally switched to using this_cpu_ptr(), but I'll try __this_cpu* instead. I think Christoph recommended that too. -- Steve