From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754760AbbCROvZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:51:25 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:33444 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750993AbbCROvY (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:51:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:50:56 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: mingo@kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de, David Woodhouse , Rik van Riel , Andrea Arcangeli , Michel Lespinasse Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] seqlock: Better document raw_write_seqcount_latch() Message-ID: <20150318145056.GO23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20150318133626.526984618@infradead.org> <20150318134631.874407995@infradead.org> <80740165.31353.1426688975785.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80740165.31353.1426688975785.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:29:35PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > + * struct entry *latch_query(struct latch_struct *latch, ...) > > + * { > > + * struct entry *entry; > > + * unsigned seq; > > + * int idx; > > very minor nit: why is seq unsigned, but idx a signed int ? > Could we do: > > unsigned seq, idx; instead ? > > Other than that: > > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers Done and thanks!