From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933250AbbCRSUr (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:20:47 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:56758 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750766AbbCRSUp (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:20:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:20:42 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Luk?? Czerner Cc: Beata Michalska , Christoph Hellwig , adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ext4: Add pollable sysfs entry for block threshold events Message-ID: <20150318182042.GA23605@infradead.org> References: <1426512329-24299-1-git-send-email-b.michalska@samsung.com> <20150316132843.GA8188@infradead.org> <550945D5.4060805@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:12:24AM +0100, Luk?? Czerner wrote: > As Jan already mentioned the problem with quota is that it really > is accounting for used space per user, which is not really ideal for > this scenario. I have not seen the tmpfs discussions so maybe > they have a solution ? > > Also, implementing noenforce should should be relatively easy. I'm not sayin we should use quota here, just a simimilar mechnisms for reporting that we hit the space limits.