From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf callchain: separate eh/debug frame offset cache.
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:03:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150319140352.GJ2983@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550A6AA0.1000005@huawei.com>
Em Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:20:16PM +0800, Wang Nan escreveu:
> Hi Ingo,
>
>> Could you please collect this patch? It fixes a bug which prevent unwind for ARM.
Hi Jiri, can I have your Acked-by for this change, since you worked on
this unwind code the most?
- Arnaldo
>
> On 2015/3/13 17:44, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Wang,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:02:56PM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
> >> Commit f1f13af99a90 ("perf callchain: Cache eh/debug frame offset for
> >> dwarf unwind") introduces a cache for .debug_frame and .eh_frame_hdr.
> >> Unfortunately, it makes them share a same cache (dso->frame_offset).
> >> Which causes unwind failure on ARM:
> >>
> >> $ perf test unwind
> >> Test dwarf unwind: FAILED!
> >>
> >> The reason is that, if a dso has '.debug_frame' but doesn't have
> >> '.eh_frame_hdr' (like ARM), dso->frame_offset will be filled by offset
> >> of '.debug_frame' during the first time calling of find_proc_info() ->
> >> read_unwind_spec_debug_frame(), and be regarded to '.eh_frame_hdr' when
> >> the second time calling of find_proc_info() ->
> >> read_unwind_spec_eh_frame(), since '.eh_frame_hdr' is checked prior to
> >> '.debug_frame'.
> >>
> >> This patch solves the problem by creating two cache fields for
> >> '.eh_frame_hdr' and '.debug_frame'.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Namhyung
> >
> >
> >> ---
> >> tools/perf/util/dso.h | 3 ++-
> >> tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c | 8 ++++----
> >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.h b/tools/perf/util/dso.h
> >> index ced9284..408c65f 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/dso.h
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.h
> >> @@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ struct dso {
> >> u32 status_seen;
> >> size_t file_size;
> >> struct list_head open_entry;
> >> - u64 frame_offset;
> >> + u64 debug_frame_offset;
> >> + u64 eh_frame_hdr_offset;
> >> } data;
> >>
> >> union { /* Tool specific area */
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c
> >> index e3c40a5..7b09a44 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c
> >> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static int read_unwind_spec_eh_frame(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine,
> >> u64 *fde_count)
> >> {
> >> int ret = -EINVAL, fd;
> >> - u64 offset = dso->data.frame_offset;
> >> + u64 offset = dso->data.eh_frame_hdr_offset;
> >>
> >> if (offset == 0) {
> >> fd = dso__data_fd(dso, machine);
> >> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int read_unwind_spec_eh_frame(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine,
> >>
> >> /* Check the .eh_frame section for unwinding info */
> >> offset = elf_section_offset(fd, ".eh_frame_hdr");
> >> - dso->data.frame_offset = offset;
> >> + dso->data.eh_frame_hdr_offset = offset;
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (offset)
> >> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static int read_unwind_spec_debug_frame(struct dso *dso,
> >> struct machine *machine, u64 *offset)
> >> {
> >> int fd;
> >> - u64 ofs = dso->data.frame_offset;
> >> + u64 ofs = dso->data.debug_frame_offset;
> >>
> >> if (ofs == 0) {
> >> fd = dso__data_fd(dso, machine);
> >> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int read_unwind_spec_debug_frame(struct dso *dso,
> >>
> >> /* Check the .debug_frame section for unwinding info */
> >> ofs = elf_section_offset(fd, ".debug_frame");
> >> - dso->data.frame_offset = ofs;
> >> + dso->data.debug_frame_offset = ofs;
> >> }
> >>
> >> *offset = ofs;
> >> --
> >> 1.8.3.4
> >>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 7:02 Wang Nan
2015-03-13 9:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-03-19 6:20 ` Wang Nan
2015-03-19 14:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-03-19 14:11 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-03-22 10:13 ` [tip:perf/core] perf callchain: Separate eh/ debug " tip-bot for Wang Nan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150319140352.GJ2983@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome