From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756738AbbCSRoV (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:44:21 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:33386 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753300AbbCSRoS (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:44:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:44:04 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Fabian Frederick Cc: Tony Lindgren , Joe Perches , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20150319174404.GY2869@sirena.org.uk> References: <1426533469-25458-1-git-send-email-fabf@skynet.be> <1426533469-25458-3-git-send-email-fabf@skynet.be> <20150317121128.GH28806@sirena.org.uk> <1489228275.7513.1426612212420.open-xchange@webmail.nmp.proximus.be> <20150317171906.GQ28806@sirena.org.uk> <239561179.7761.1426613177885.open-xchange@webmail.nmp.proximus.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wHYmV+hLPeNaasdK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <239561179.7761.1426613177885.open-xchange@webmail.nmp.proximus.be> X-Cookie: Wanna buy a duck? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/35 linux-next] regulator: constify of_device_id array X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --wHYmV+hLPeNaasdK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 06:26:17PM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote: > > On 17 March 2015 at 18:19 Mark Brown wrote: > > Well, another thing to do if there's no dependencies is to just send > > each patch separately - there's no real relationship between the > > patches.=A0 This also avoids the issue. > Such trivial updates are generally applied by David or Greg > after receiving some ack. That's the reason for the patchset :) It's pretty disappointing if that's the case, though it might be something connected with the submission style - for most of the kernel patches would normally be handled directly by the maintainer. --wHYmV+hLPeNaasdK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVCwrjAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ/WoH/iFg6I3ySnb5LmorKlH0rRrz O97ceRT4lsCkEnvwixBkkWOEvueRPNQCAd1xskEp/Sltq/dxUK7KrbH0r9aoqEwk AN3lQreYARtEH3d1ahrC94mkhkojVmDYct2hFWlgck1S3FwURaF/JdawAnG5g2If ElpbZ7d+bFgch1Cbg9VSbKSz9mycWwzZ2SsfMn5Pz+AfLPZO8d86I2uGLKn1vWzA Mqrb0uX4xgumV0NxiS+a6jWZnXeaHZOxFjmFQXvPGyiaui87ybRBNrxZT5z4KbBm M3ImpetyXRWzfreJESJeIZJiId6wPlSnxY6pJKr5bDDH+Z6V/DSalRZQH/HRci0= =ZQSv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wHYmV+hLPeNaasdK--