From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752694AbbCWNnh (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:43:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:35102 "EHLO mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752317AbbCWNnX (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:43:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 19:13:11 +0530 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Dan Carpenter , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Teddy Wang , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2 1/5] staging: sm750fb: Use memset_io instead of memset Message-ID: <20150323133048.GA27897@sudip-PC> References: <20150323105323.GA10964@mwanda> <20150323115129.GI10964@mwanda> <20150323125513.GB8151@sudip-PC> <20150323131422.GE8151@sudip-PC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 01:25:37PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > On 23 March 2015 at 13:21, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > Sigh. Checking the emails I actually sent, I seem to *somehow* have > > sent old files in this resend :S I really don't know how this > > happened. My copies of the patches all apply perfectly correctly, but > > these are not the ones I sent. > > And just to add to my embarrassment, this is actually *not* the case, > they DO all apply, gmail mangled the patches. So they seem fine after > all! > > Sudip - could you try to carefully grab each of the 5 patches with > [RESEND 2] in the subject to make sure you are applying them > correctly? my apologies. they are applying properly. i had them already applied for testing that hardware change, and again i tried to apply them. sorry for the confusion. :( regards sudip > > Best, > > -- > Lorenzo Stoakes > https:/ljs.io