From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752821AbbCXKoA (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:44:00 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:42644 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752052AbbCXKnv (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:43:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:43:46 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: David Miller Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, tadeusz.struk@intel.com Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree Message-ID: <20150324104346.GA7422@lst.de> References: <20150324134508.77b039a9@canb.auug.org.au> <20150323.230003.1242651745820752377.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150323.230003.1242651745820752377.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:00:03PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > Ok, more conflicts wiht Al's vfs work. > > This is starting to pile on, heavily... These are my changes. But I think it would be much better if any aio-related changes like this one we be one on top of my changes in Al's iocb branch, there have been various changes, and it would be better to review and commit the changes on top of it instead of carrying the changes as fixups. Nevermind the actual test coverage..