From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932098AbbCYNZK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:25:10 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:35028 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750913AbbCYNZG (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:25:06 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:26:50 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [Linux v4.0-rc5] Warnings in drm_framebuffer_reference() and
 drm_atomic_check_only()
Message-ID: <20150325132650.GZ1349@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mail-Followup-To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
References: <CA+icZUXbM-Aq0v0-ZVdJptgQ3sUFs64unf4ubNeTP6Lgyq=6fg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150323082506.GD1349@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <CA+icZUW=ejVH8vMHG8oSVyz4UjOPcHx97WG7SFiTuNb3mrz3ng@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUW=ejVH8vMHG8oSVyz4UjOPcHx97WG7SFiTuNb3mrz3ng@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 4.0.0-rc3+ 
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 07:09:03PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 07:25:27AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I did my weekly update of the Linux RC (here: v4.0-rc5) and fell over
> >> some warning in the drm area.
> >>
> >> Please have a look...
> >
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> > Just to confirm: Both are new in -rc5 and haven't been around in -rc4?
> >
> 
> Yeah, rc4 was OK but with rc5 I have seen these warnings.
> 
> > Also can you pls give -nightly a spin and see what happens there?
> >
> 
> drm-intel-nightly (2015y-03m-24d-09h-19m-43s UTC) pulled on top of rc5
> does not show any warnings in the drm | i915 area.

drm-fixes has 2 cherry-picks from -next to address the worst offenders,
there's one more which is waiting for confirmation:

commit fb9981aa675eb7b398849915364916fd98833cfa
Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Date:   Thu Feb 5 19:24:25 2015 +0000

    drm/i915: Fix atomic state when reusing the firmware fb

Please apply that commit from -next on top of drm-fixes and retest.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch