From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753337AbbDAClC (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:41:02 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]:33201 "EHLO mail-qc0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753179AbbDACk7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:40:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:40:55 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Aleksa Sarai Cc: lizefan@huawei.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, richard@nod.at, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] cgroups: add pids subsystem Message-ID: <20150401024055.GK9974@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1427855490-5280-1-git-send-email-cyphar@cyphar.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 01:36:06PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > Hi Tejun, > > I decided to send out this version of the patchset (that has the additional > callback, and passes around an opaque "fork state" inside the copy_process() > callback), because I personally prefer this version of the patchset (it's much > cleaner and doesn't mess around with the fork() callback for no good reason). > If you *really* want the other one, I can send it. Yes, please. -- tejun