From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753702AbbDAMAd (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:00:33 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:45940 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753290AbbDAMA2 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:00:28 -0400
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:59:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched,nohz: fallback to housekeeping cpus before
 fallback to possible cpus
Message-ID: <20150401115957.GL23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1427879172-22711-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1427879172-22711-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 05:06:12PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Let the processes which lose they original cpus run on housekeeping cpus
> if they can to reduce disturbances on nohz_full cpus.

Its a fail if you get here in the first place, why should we fix that?