From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752925AbbDBRZc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:25:32 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:54389 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751497AbbDBRZ3 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:25:29 -0400
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 19:25:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, maninder1.s@samsung.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yn.gaur@samsung.com>,
        AJEET YADAV <ajeet.y@samsung.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: restart_syscall: use freezable blocking call
Message-ID: <20150402172513.GE23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <380509604.92081427713655432.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas01c>
 <20150330154351.2582ba70df824c6ccc55fb28@linux-foundation.org>
 <1982905.Ac4fTCSUaY@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <20150331150730.GJ23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <551D683C.2050601@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <551D683C.2050601@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:03:08PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> It's not correct.

Yay for lockdep ;-)

> [    0.645644] debug_check_no_locks_held (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4178)

Should we also have that call in freezer_do_not_count() ?