From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/signal: Remove pax argument from restore_sigcontext
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:42:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150407094244.GA10973@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMzpN2jbnUnAjqLK+TiA5t8-MgjoV5vdnkO4G6hGcULmGW7n+A@mail.gmail.com>
* Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > I'm wondering what the original reason for adding the extra
> >> > handling of regs->ax was. Maybe something changed regs->ax - but I
> >> > cannot find such code path anymore.
> >> >
> >> > It would be nice to try to do a bit of Git archeology to figure
> >> > out the origins of this complication - maybe it's something subtle
> >> > - or it's something that has changed meanwhile.
> >>
> >> It goes all the way back to 2.1.106pre1, when restore_sigcontext()
> >> was changed to return an error code instead of EAX directly.
> >>
> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/history/history.git/diff/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c?id=9a8f8b7ca3f319bd668298d447bdf32730e51174
> >
> > Indeed: restore_sigcontext() used to return eax as a return value,
> > without copying it into regs->ax.
> >
> > Then in 2007
>
> Version 2.1.106 was released on Jun 13, 1998.
Sigh, the Git timestamp of the historic tree threw me off :-)
> > sigaltstack syscall support was added, where the return value of
> > restore_sigcontext() was changed to carry the memory-copying
> > failure code. But instead of putting 'ax' into regs->ax, it was
> > carried in via a pointer and then returned, where the generic
> > syscall return code copied it to regs->ax.
> >
> > So there was never any deeper reason for this suboptimal pattern,
> > it was simply never noticed after being introduced.
> >
> > (Btw., the regs->ax we return will be copied back to regs->ax
> > after the syscall straight away once again - but I guess this
> > cannot be helped.)
>
> The 64-bit stub could skip saving it back to regs.
Yeah, but at the cost of having a duplicated entry stub, right?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-04 12:58 Brian Gerst
2015-04-04 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-04 17:07 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-05 5:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-05 0:01 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-06 7:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-06 12:00 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-07 9:42 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-04-07 9:40 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150407094244.GA10973@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome