From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753677AbbDIQwr (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 12:52:47 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:39569 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751645AbbDIQwq (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 12:52:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 18:52:43 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Cc: Andrew Morton , Alessandro Zummo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: bindings: add abracon,abx80x Message-ID: <20150409165242.GB20669@piout.net> References: <1427856743-26625-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <1427856743-26625-2-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20150409132523.GA4421@frolo.macqel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150409132523.GA4421@frolo.macqel> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 09/04/2015 at 15:25:23 +0200, Philippe De Muyter wrote : > Hi Alexandre, > > when I look into Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc, it seems that > all rtc but a few (mainly old ones) have the "-rtc" suffix in the > "compatible" property. > > Would it not be better to keep it here also, like what I had written ? > No, they have that suffix because they are RTC IPs part of a SoC so the chosen compatible is -rtc. In the case of the abracon RTC, it would be redundant. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com