From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964835AbbDJPsl (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:48:41 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:33067 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933312AbbDJPsh (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:48:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:48:09 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Lee Jones , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Boris BREZILLON , Maxime Ripard , Carlo Caione , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <20150410154809.GN6023@sirena.org.uk> References: <1428638946-24890-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <1428638946-24890-5-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nsPtqSQouSbQITiF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1428638946-24890-5-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> X-Cookie: I've been there. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 4/6] regulator: axp20x: add support for AXP22X regulators X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nsPtqSQouSbQITiF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:09:04PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > This patch depends on the previous patch "regulator: axp20x: prepare > support for multiple AXP chip families" and the mfd header from the > first patch "mfd: axp20x: add AXP22x PMIC support". > Could we merge both regulator patches through the mfd tree, with the > other patches in the series? There are no other external dependencies. Yes, of course we can - that's the whole point of me sending a Reviewed-by! Half of what I'm trying to do with that is to cut down on the number of reposts of MFD series I get sent :( --nsPtqSQouSbQITiF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVJ/C4AAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ07gH/R18au9gYUDBQEq9sBPMSVyT 5kvFi3L09Om6NnvKLQ1CgvXwtRIWQnXAcivSB75WIUHP6LIMIABS45nmXXo6XE6l VnaglSHw88x1Q62xAtIUSL7zyd1qZfCNvz8uPqsV3g49dEtLto+rLrmboKwZUnUU uNRnD7TZI846qhH5c7Wd6tpIFX8tdT7IAR8Ify8zwzMWlm7ocY1BU67ytf1yyEdH BrVn2R7Wt3M928vytSWv4UJlnYDbMc4FTsoKiZeF110Mx9PIw60UHypTT0UZd183 gm16UsUp+CV603ZCCwOl7P967sXzbsmexNQ2dmP24SHVsC90JHbBrYSlBd3UDwI= =zTAI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nsPtqSQouSbQITiF--