From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753292AbbD0Qkz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:40:55 -0400
Received: from mail-qc0-f170.google.com ([209.85.216.170]:35539 "EHLO
	mail-qc0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753190AbbD0Qkm (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:40:42 -0400
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:40:38 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitmap: remove explicit newline handling using scnprintf
 format string
Message-ID: <20150427164038.GH1499@htj.duckdns.org>
References: <1430128018-14667-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
 <20150427161434.GF1499@htj.duckdns.org>
 <553E6328.2040904@arm.com>
 <20150427163000.GG1499@htj.duckdns.org>
 <553E6631.6080205@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <553E6631.6080205@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 05:39:13PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >Yeah, let's get rid of it.
> 
> /me confused, is it fine to push this patch first, and follow up later
> after auditing thoroughly to replace with direct scnprintf()

I don't really care how it happens as long as the end result is the
same.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun