From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751389AbbD3SKc (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:10:32 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:50401 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751211AbbD3SK3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:10:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:10:25 -0700 From: Darren Hart To: Kast Bernd Cc: corentin.chary@gmail.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] ACPI: activate&export acpi_os_get_physical_address Message-ID: <20150430181025.GC40200@fury.dvhart.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 04:12:24PM +0200, Kast Bernd wrote: > acpi_os_get_physical_address will be needed by an acpi driver (asus-wmi.c). > Additionally it could be used by dell-laptop.c instead of directly calling virt_to_phys. > > acpi_os_get_physical_address gets exported and ACPI_FUTURE_USAGE is removed > Hrm, well... this doesn't get rid of virt_to_phys, it just wraps it really. I'm not sure that makes this any more acceptable than the original from Felipe - but that's not my call. Rafael? Len? -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center