From: Dong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@freescale.com>,
<linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<mturquette@linaro.org>, <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<Ranjani.Vaidyanathan@freescale.com>, <b20596@freescale.com>,
<r64343@freescale.com>, <b20788@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/5] clk: remove unneeded __clk_enable and __clk_disable
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:16:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504081609.GB4082@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150430220548.GA31047@codeaurora.org>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 03:05:48PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/30, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 04/15/15 07:26, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > > The only thing __clk_enable/__clk_disable does is NULL pointer checking
> > > of clk except calling clk_core_{enable|disable} which is already handled
> > > by clk_core_{enable|disable}.
> > > So remove this unneeded function.
> > >
> > > Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@freescale.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > No. You can call clk_enable() and clk_disable() with NULL and it should
> > be a no-op. With this change it would cause a NULL pointer exception.
> >
>
> Here's the proper patch. I'll leave you as author.
>
Got your point.
Thanks for the change.
Regards
Dong Aisheng
> ---8<---
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 0227ac3d5b1a..e45255226ffa 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -1023,14 +1023,6 @@ static void clk_core_disable(struct clk_core *core)
> clk_core_disable(core->parent);
> }
>
> -static void __clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
> -{
> - if (!clk)
> - return;
> -
> - clk_core_disable(clk->core);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * clk_disable - gate a clock
> * @clk: the clk being gated
> @@ -1051,7 +1043,7 @@ void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
> return;
>
> flags = clk_enable_lock();
> - __clk_disable(clk);
> + clk_core_disable(clk->core);
> clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_disable);
> @@ -1089,14 +1081,6 @@ static int clk_core_enable(struct clk_core *core)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int __clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
> -{
> - if (!clk)
> - return 0;
> -
> - return clk_core_enable(clk->core);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * clk_enable - ungate a clock
> * @clk: the clk being ungated
> @@ -1115,8 +1099,11 @@ int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
> unsigned long flags;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!clk)
> + return 0;
> +
> flags = clk_enable_lock();
> - ret = __clk_enable(clk);
> + ret = clk_core_enable(clk->core);
> clk_enable_unlock(flags);
>
> return ret;
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-15 14:26 [PATCH RFC v1 0/5] clk: support clocks which requires parent clock on during operation Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/5] clk: change clk_core name of __clk_set_parent_after Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30 19:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04 8:15 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/5] clk: add missing lock when call clk_core_enable in clk_set_parent Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30 19:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04 8:35 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-07 0:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-13 9:21 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/5] clk: remove unneeded __clk_enable and __clk_disable Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30 19:09 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-04-30 22:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04 8:16 ` Dong Aisheng [this message]
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 4/5] clk: core: add CLK_SET_PARENT_ON flags to support clocks require parent on Dong Aisheng
2015-05-01 1:09 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04 10:36 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-06 23:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-13 9:20 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 5/5] clk: introduce clk_core_enable_lock and clk_core_disable_lock functions Dong Aisheng
2015-05-01 1:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04 10:38 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-22 6:12 ` [PATCH RFC v1 0/5] clk: support clocks which requires parent clock on during operation Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30 2:37 ` Dong Aisheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150504081609.GB4082@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net \
--to=b29396@freescale.com \
--cc=Ranjani.Vaidyanathan@freescale.com \
--cc=aisheng.dong@freescale.com \
--cc=b20596@freescale.com \
--cc=b20788@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=r64343@freescale.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®