mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@freescale.com>,
	<linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<mturquette@linaro.org>, <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<Ranjani.Vaidyanathan@freescale.com>, <b20596@freescale.com>,
	<r64343@freescale.com>, <b20788@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/5] clk: remove unneeded __clk_enable and __clk_disable
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:16:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504081609.GB4082@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150430220548.GA31047@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 03:05:48PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/30, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 04/15/15 07:26, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > > The only thing __clk_enable/__clk_disable does is NULL pointer checking
> > > of clk except calling clk_core_{enable|disable} which is already handled
> > > by clk_core_{enable|disable}.
> > > So remove this unneeded function.
> > >
> > > Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@freescale.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > No. You can call clk_enable() and clk_disable() with NULL and it should
> > be a no-op. With this change it would cause a NULL pointer exception.
> > 
> 
> Here's the proper patch. I'll leave you as author.
> 

Got your point.
Thanks for the change.

Regards
Dong Aisheng

> ---8<---
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 0227ac3d5b1a..e45255226ffa 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -1023,14 +1023,6 @@ static void clk_core_disable(struct clk_core *core)
>  	clk_core_disable(core->parent);
>  }
>  
> -static void __clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
> -{
> -	if (!clk)
> -		return;
> -
> -	clk_core_disable(clk->core);
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * clk_disable - gate a clock
>   * @clk: the clk being gated
> @@ -1051,7 +1043,7 @@ void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
>  		return;
>  
>  	flags = clk_enable_lock();
> -	__clk_disable(clk);
> +	clk_core_disable(clk->core);
>  	clk_enable_unlock(flags);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_disable);
> @@ -1089,14 +1081,6 @@ static int clk_core_enable(struct clk_core *core)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int __clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
> -{
> -	if (!clk)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	return clk_core_enable(clk->core);
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * clk_enable - ungate a clock
>   * @clk: the clk being ungated
> @@ -1115,8 +1099,11 @@ int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (!clk)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	flags = clk_enable_lock();
> -	ret = __clk_enable(clk);
> +	ret = clk_core_enable(clk->core);
>  	clk_enable_unlock(flags);
>  
>  	return ret;
> 
> -- 
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-04  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-15 14:26 [PATCH RFC v1 0/5] clk: support clocks which requires parent clock on during operation Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/5] clk: change clk_core name of __clk_set_parent_after Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30 19:06   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04  8:15     ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/5] clk: add missing lock when call clk_core_enable in clk_set_parent Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30 19:07   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04  8:35     ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-07  0:01       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-13  9:21         ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/5] clk: remove unneeded __clk_enable and __clk_disable Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30 19:09   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-04-30 22:05     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04  8:16       ` Dong Aisheng [this message]
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 4/5] clk: core: add CLK_SET_PARENT_ON flags to support clocks require parent on Dong Aisheng
2015-05-01  1:09   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04 10:36     ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-06 23:34       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-13  9:20         ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 5/5] clk: introduce clk_core_enable_lock and clk_core_disable_lock functions Dong Aisheng
2015-05-01  1:10   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04 10:38     ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-22  6:12 ` [PATCH RFC v1 0/5] clk: support clocks which requires parent clock on during operation Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30  2:37   ` Dong Aisheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150504081609.GB4082@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net \
    --to=b29396@freescale.com \
    --cc=Ranjani.Vaidyanathan@freescale.com \
    --cc=aisheng.dong@freescale.com \
    --cc=b20596@freescale.com \
    --cc=b20788@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=r64343@freescale.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®