From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751925AbbEGTUV (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2015 15:20:21 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0121.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.121]:51465 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751313AbbEGTUQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2015 15:20:16 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1567:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3868:3870:3871:5007:6261:7875:7903:8660:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12555:12740:13069:13148:13230:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: crate66_3bff83be25c32 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1397 Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 15:20:11 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Al Viro Cc: David Howells , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: Add back check for !inode in walk_component() Message-ID: <20150507152011.47c8aa71@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20150507181335.GE889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20150507125241.4da739ac@gandalf.local.home> <20150507172834.GD889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150507133935.2d2e3181@gandalf.local.home> <20150507181335.GE889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 May 2015 19:13:35 +0100 Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 01:39:35PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I had them printed in my previous traces. The flags were 0x200088, and > > they were 0 just before the call. > > Not dentry->d_flags, nd->flags. Most interesting part is bit 6 in those > (LOOKUP_RCU, 0x40). nd->flags == 0x51 -- Steve