From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751460AbbEGWC5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2015 18:02:57 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0146.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.146]:51587 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750900AbbEGWCy (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2015 18:02:54 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:5007:6119:6261:7875:7903:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12663:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: feet46_1918123498c07 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1880 Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 18:02:50 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Al Viro Cc: David Howells , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: Add back check for !inode in walk_component() Message-ID: <20150507180250.00e1ca3b@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20150507214755.GG889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20150507125241.4da739ac@gandalf.local.home> <20150507172834.GD889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150507133935.2d2e3181@gandalf.local.home> <20150507181335.GE889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150507184343.GF889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150507153321.3b77d873@gandalf.local.home> <20150507214755.GG889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 May 2015 22:47:55 +0100 Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 03:33:21PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 7 May 2015 19:43:43 +0100 > > Al Viro wrote: > > > > > > > Actually, could you try the following on top of -rc2? > > > > Gives me the following on boot up: > > Gah... Sorry, I'm an idiot - *path is left uninitialized in that > case. Fixed. Could you see if that works? > It booted. Now I'm running my tests on it. Seems to survive. I'll reboot without it and see how long it takes to crash, and then I'll make sure that it can survive at least 10x that time. I may not report back till tomorrow (unless it crashes early). -- Steve