From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752757AbbEHJ6e (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 05:58:34 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:2524 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751409AbbEHJ6d (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 05:58:33 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,390,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="725879208" Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 12:56:21 +0300 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Felipe Balbi , David Cohen , Stephen Boyd , Baolu Lu , Paul Bolle , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?W82EUEFUQ0h2?= =?utf-8?Q?4?= 01/12] usb: add bus type for USB ULPI Message-ID: <20150508095621.GA6154@kuha.fi.intel.com> References: <1430979572-14768-1-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <1430979572-14768-2-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <20150507204604.GA28684@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150507204604.GA28684@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:46:04PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:19:21AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > +config USB_ULPI_BUS > > + bool "USB ULPI PHY interface support" > > Can't we make this a module? There is actually nothing preventing it. I removed the possibility of building this as a module at one point because... I guess just because a voice inside my head told me to do so. Thanks for catching this one. > > + depends on USB_SUPPORT > > + help > > + Say yes if you have ULPI PHY attached to your USB controller. > > You need to put more information here as to what "ULPI" means, and how > would anyone know if they have this type of thing attached to their USB > controller. > > You need to help users / distros out in letting them know if they should > enable this or not. As it is, I have no idea if I should even enable > this on my systems... OK. Thanks, -- heikki