From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753057AbbEKOvm (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 10:51:42 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56244 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751096AbbEKOvk (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 10:51:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:51:37 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Omar Sandoval Cc: Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Btrfs: show subvolume name and ID in /proc/mounts Message-ID: <20150511145137.GN23255@suse.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Omar Sandoval , Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20150511094258.GA18249@mew> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150511094258.GA18249@mew> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 02:42:58AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > Sorry for the long-winded email! Thoughts, David, Qu? I'm ok with the approach and the patchset as a whole. There was one minor issue with the aliasing of the toplevel subvolume (id 0 or 5). I'll post a comment to the patch.