From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] sched: Pull preemption disablement duty up to __schedule() callers
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:56:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150511155634.GB32512@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150511155213.GY21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:52:13PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:08:22PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -2723,9 +2723,7 @@ again:
> > * - return from syscall or exception to user-space
> > * - return from interrupt-handler to user-space
> > *
> > - * WARNING: all callers must re-check need_resched() afterward and reschedule
> > - * accordingly in case an event triggered the need for rescheduling (such as
> > - * an interrupt waking up a task) while preemption was disabled in __schedule().
> > + * WARNING: must be called with preemption disabled!
> > */
> > static void __sched __schedule(void)
> > {
> > @@ -2734,7 +2732,6 @@ static void __sched __schedule(void)
> > struct rq *rq;
> > int cpu;
> >
> > - preempt_disable();
> > cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> > rcu_note_context_switch();
> > @@ -2798,8 +2795,6 @@ static void __sched __schedule(void)
> > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
> >
> > post_schedule(rq);
> > -
> > - sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
> > }
>
> Ah, see, you need to fold this patch into the previous one.
Yeah I hesitated. I'm going to fold then.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-11 15:08 [RFC PATCH 0/7] preempt: A few headers cleanups and preempt_schedule*() optimizations Frederic Weisbecker
2015-05-11 15:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] preempt: Merge preempt_mask.h into preempt.h Frederic Weisbecker
2015-05-11 15:08 ` [PATCH 2/7] preempt: Rearrange a few symbols after headers merge Frederic Weisbecker
2015-05-11 15:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] preempt: Rename PREEMPT_CHECK_OFFSET to PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET Frederic Weisbecker
2015-05-11 15:08 ` [PATCH 4/7] preempt: Disable preemption from preempt_schedule*() callers Frederic Weisbecker
2015-05-11 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-11 15:08 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched: Pull preemption disablement duty up to __schedule() callers Frederic Weisbecker
2015-05-11 15:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-11 15:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2015-05-11 15:08 ` [PATCH 6/7] preempt: Fix out of date comment Frederic Weisbecker
2015-05-11 15:08 ` [PATCH 7/7] preempt: Remove PREEMPT_ACTIVE unmasking off in_atomic() Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150511155634.GB32512@lerouge \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®