From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@coreos.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@coreos.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, kristen@linux.intel.com,
sgunderson@bigfoot.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] libata: Add firmware_default LPM policy
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:28:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150511202830.GH11388@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPeXnHuSccpYkDRmWO5tKuec2q0WqX7Ktxk_yX9te77xrEe=SA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, Matthew.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 01:24:18PM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Ok, I've had one person testing this report the following:
>
> [ 1896.902726] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x800 SErr 0x40000 action 0x0
> [ 1896.902735] ata1.00: irq_stat 0x40000008
> [ 1896.902741] ata1: SError: { CommWake }
> [ 1896.902748] ata1.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
> [ 1896.902758] ata1.00: cmd 61/18:58:88:d5:5d/00:00:0d:00:00/40 tag 11
> ncq 12288 out
> res 41/04:00:9f:d5:5d/00:00:0d:00:00/40 Emask 0x401 (device error) <F>
> [ 1896.902764] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
> [ 1896.902768] ata1.00: error: { ABRT }
> [ 1896.912725] ata1.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully accessible
> [ 1896.932716] ata1.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully accessible
> [ 1896.942783] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
> [ 1896.942815] ata1: EH complete
>
> which seems to occur in batches. I'm a little confused - isn't it
> legitimate for the phy to report comwake here?
CommWake isn't the problem here. SError is being dumped just for
information. The disk is reporting failure on a write command which
is diagnosed as "device error" and thus the link is not reset. It's
really the device actively reporting command failure.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-18 15:26 Rework AHCI LPM handling a little Matthew Garrett
2015-04-18 15:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] libata: Stash initial power management configuration Matthew Garrett
2015-04-21 21:26 ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-18 15:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] libata: Add firmware_default LPM policy Matthew Garrett
2015-04-22 14:48 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-11 20:24 ` Matthew Garrett
2015-05-11 20:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-05-11 20:34 ` Matthew Garrett
2015-05-11 20:43 ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-18 15:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] libata: Change medium_power LPM policy to match Intel recommendations Matthew Garrett
2015-04-22 14:51 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150511202830.GH11388@htj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=kristen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.garrett@coreos.com \
--cc=mjg59@coreos.com \
--cc=sgunderson@bigfoot.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®